My Swiss Army Knife

I have a few items I can consider to be both minimalist and indulgences.  Maybe minimalist isn’t even the word I want to use.  But I have found that having the right tool for the job is only bested by the experience of having one right tool that performs many jobs.  Pairing down our possessions to the fewest number of “right tools” without needing to use a wrong tool is the heart of what I’m getting at here.  Normally, I post about software, but today I want to share some thoughts about things.

Perhaps the first on my list is my Smart Cabriolet.  I have to really flog it and put in 87 octane petrol to get it to dip below 37 mpg.  My Smart is safer than a bicycle, moped, scooter, or motorcycle.  Yes, it gets worse gas mileage, but a check of fueleconomy.gov reveals that it gets the best fuel economy of any non-hybrid automatic transmission vehicle.  Since studies have shown that one needs to spend $88,000 or more on a Mercedes hybrid to find a hybrid whose economy will pay for its higher-than-gasoline-equivalent model, I would have to say I have the most economical car on the road (at least until EV’s start wide distribution).  Unlike electric vehicles, I can drive my Smart until I keel over from exhaustion or run out of continent.  But it is an indulgence that wouldn’t have been needed had I opted to live closer to work or the transit center.  Given that I live in a suburb and have a job, but only 24 hours in my day, a car is a necessity.  (The Triangle Transit Trip Planner estimates just shy of 3.5 hours to commute by bus.)

The Smart marries up well with my Droid Incredible.  Among smarthphone operating systems in current release, I believe Android to be the only acceptable operating system for a phone.  With my speakers jacked into the Smart radio and the phone cradled in the upper cup holder, I have all the podcasts and tunes-to-commute-by that a guy could ever want.  If you have, um, business to take care of in the rest room, it also sports a Kindle app to pass the time as you pass the, well, never mind.

Smartphones are not a necessity any more than a car.  Indeed, I could go naked and gather nuts and berries.  But when one considers that the smartphone has replaced the radio, the cd-player, the home phone, the car map, the encyclopedia, the atlas, the dictionary, the camera, the movie camera, the filing cabinet, the calculator, etc.  It seems kind of minimalist, doesn’t it?

Is a Kindle minimalist?  It is definitely environmentally friendly.  Fewer pulp trees cut.  No carbon fuels burned to ship books (which are quite dense and, therefore, heavy to ship).  But it also allows for far fewer trips to the book store or library.  One doesn’t need a big house to store one’s personal library which also saves energy costs.  Reading glasses are unnecessary because the font size can be enlarged instead.  Yes, the Kindle does rarely need to have its battery recharged, but I think that in balance we would have to say it is pretty green.  Multi-tools are only acceptable by my criteria if each of the tools are actually good at what they do.  I love the Kindle app on the Incredible and iPad, but nothing beats the experience of reading on a Kindle.  I read more because of it.  It is a single purpose tool that justifies its existence because the purpose is important enough to warrant a dedicated device.  Since the Kindle replaces shelves filled with dead trees and the room needed for the shelves it is also minimalist for someone who has evolved to the point of reading.

With the iPad pointing to the future, I would argue that a tablet computer or netbook is an energy efficient and compact entertainment center and communication (email, messaging, social websites, and, hopefully soon, VOIP and video chat) device.  Less mail means this is green, also.  Portability is critical to nomadic but social folk.  While I am less than secretly covetous of my wife’s iPad, I am holding out to see what Android tablets are released before Christmas.

A computer with a Ceton four tuner cablecard-ready PCI-express card, a Blu-Ray player and the Windows 7 Media Center replaces the DVR and DVD player as well as making the minimal allowance for work to be done.  Not that I own this system, but I aspire to do so.  I do have a Windows 7 HTPC that I consider to be better than any other system I’ve used in the past.  The most fun of the electronics we own is also the most productive.  Books can be written; movies produced; pictures edited; art generated; music composed and recorded.  The new patron of the arts doesn’t play politics but democratically enables every aspiring creative artist with a means to make their vision a reality.  Any technology, structure, or modern abode will be given birth through computer-generated drawing and project plans.  Life sciences will be postulated, modeled, and reported.  Medical research will be statistically scrutinized, experts will collaborate, and medical histories will be recorded.  All of this from one little energy-sipping box.  Human reason and imagination channeled through that box and leveraged by the internet community has changed and will continue to change the world.

A roof over our heads; a place to rest our heads; an environment controlled to allow for maximum productivity, creativity, and enriched living; a locale that is our own, our nest, our refuge, our home; a place to cook rather than eat processed meals; a garden; with art to feed our spirits.  A house can be easily over-done and over-emphasized.  In a world of need, a house is a luxury and a necessity.  That others have less does not mean that they or we deserve less.  A body needs shelter.  A soul needs a home.

And in most climates, the sun, the rain, the heat, the cold, or some combination makes clothing a necessity.  Like a house, clothing can also be easily over-done and over-emphasized.  Like a house clothing both protects us and expresses us.  Clothing is a necessity but a minimalist might wish to show restraint in going beyond necessity.  But I’n not suggesting a drab wardrobe in place of creative and stylish expression.  I just prefer elegance to ostentation.

Swiss Army Knife Classic SDLastly, comes one’s baggage.  My messenger bag has taken the place of the kerchief on a stick.  It makes available the resources to get the most out of my equipment and my travels.  Within that bag I carry a paradigm of all these multipurpose possessions, my Swiss Army Knife.

Do I have more than I need?  Like most Americans, my answer is obvious.  But occasionally I like to step back and think about what I have versus what I need and weigh whether I have lost the balance between need, desire, and stewardship.

What do you have?  What do you need?  What do you share?  Will the mark we leave in passing be a divot from the turf or a tree beneath the sky?

Posted in Personal observations | Tagged , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Kindled a Dream

The Kindle amazes me. Everyone who ever had to watch a black & white TV knows full well that color is better. So why is it that the Kindle is my go-to device for reading? The display is easy on my eyes – I would argue that it is better than reading print. But I think a big part of it is that the Kindle is light and thin and “right” sized. Despite the screen being so much smaller than the iPad screen, I would rather hold this more diminutive reader. (There are persistent rumors to the effect that iPad 2 will be a 7″ tablet.) Well, as much as I love my wife’s iPad, the Kindle has caused me to dream of the day when a six or seven inch tablet (are you hearing me Samsung?) comes to market. Let it have functionality at least equal to my Droid Incredible and a battery life competitive with iPad (not that I would complain if it could pull off Kindle equivalents). Put a decent DoggCatcher level podcast catcher on there with Netflix, a Kindle app, and a webkit-based browser and offer it at a decent price and “Merry Christmas, Tommy.” Oh, and please can I have an ePub reader for ebooks from my library? I’ll be really good.

Posted in Geeky | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

Nothing But Net

Google

Do No Evil

How many internets are there? Google, by virtue of its Android operating system, is in business with cell phone carriers and manufacturers. So it is no surprise that they recently sided with Verizon, the largest wireless broadband carrier, to argue that Congress should not give the FCC the power to require neutral wireless access to the internet. AT&T quickly followed suit. What this means is that attempts to convey information wirelessly may be “prioritized” by the corporations that control the air waves. That might be relatively benign such as the generic prioritization of packets conveying voice transmissions over those containing torrents to optimize the use of bandwidths. However, this freedom to prioritize without oversight could lead to throttling access to or from political organizations whose messages are at odds with those of the corporations.

See these carriers are also content providers and they could choose to prioritize transmission of their content versus that of an individual’s or a competitor’s. The reason the FCC, the government expression of “The Man”, regulating the internet for net neutrality is a good thing is because it prevents “The Man” of corporations from pursuing their corporate interests at the expense of a free people on a free internet. The Tea Party would have us believe that the internet would only be regulated by giving the FCC authority over it. Think about what the word ‘regulate’ means. Access to the internet is already regulated. The regulation is just done by the service providers in accordance with their corporate interests. We poor little guys better speak up now. Who knows when our posts will be blocked “to conserve bandwidth.” Failure to protect equal access to the internet, whether wireless or wireline, is one step closer to a totalitarian regime in which no cell phones will be able to post from the next Tiananmen Square.

Our free speech and access to free speech is being threatened by corporate self-interest and political naivety. There is one internet and it shouldn’t matter whether you’re an urbanite with wireline access or can only access it through your phone or portable device. Net neutrality for part of the population but not for another is not net neutrality. If you want to watch funny kittens on Vimeo instead of YouTube, Google shouldn’t be in a position to prevent that on your Android handset even if they have sold their soul to wireless carriers.

Can you tell I feel strongly about this?

CrunchGear
Wired
betanews
NYTimes

Posted in Geeky, Personal observations | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Nothing But Net

"Let the Sea Resound"

As news sources like USA Today tout headlines like, “La. marshes damaged by oil, but surprisingly resilient” and Fox & Friends Sunday says its not the oil killing turtles but low oxygen in the water and ABC News likewise downplaying the environmental impact, voices speaking the truth are rarely heard.  As a Christian environmentalist, it is often difficult for me to accept that the church does not advance the biblical stewardship of earth’s resources better than we do.  So, I was very pleased to see this article in Christianity Today.  BP and the government we elected to oversee them both may have been negligent and it is understandable (though not good) that both entities want to back away from dealing with this disaster in a straight-forward manner.  BP has apparently called for reducing the resources working on the clean up and the current administration seems preoccupied with blaming the previous one.  I, for one, am thrilled to hear a voice from the church call us as a community to accountability and action.

Posted in Tree Hugging | Comments Off on "Let the Sea Resound"

You Sayin'

I’m not normal?



For some people the web is a place to go out into cyberspace and return with treasures of information.  You live and breathe Google, Bing, Yahoo, and Wikipedia.  Others of us use the web primarily as a place of commerce.  Goods and services flow into your home on the Amazon river.  Early adopters are doing their computing in the cloud.  A few of us are content creators, posting words in blogs, pictures in albums, and videos on channels.  Many venture into cyberspace for the social scene.  I have really come late to that scene.

I view the social web as falling into two categories, ‘Facebook’ and ‘Other.’  Despite my distrust of the underlying business model and corporate philosophy of Facebook, they do offer a seamless and simple service for sharing words, photos, and videos with friends.  For some, it just makes sense to connect socially in Facebook and never venture beyond her borders.  But if you’re really into writing or photography or videography you may have other favorite sites for presenting your media.  Tinkerers, control-freaks, and fanatics will not be satisfied with the one-size-fits-all (or you’re the wrong size) Facebook approach.  Some of us try to fix this using Facebook Connect on other services and piping what we do there back into Facebook but isn’t that really a vicious cycle in which who we are is squeezed back into the Facebook mold?  Facebook is slick and simple and will satisfy the needs of the majority of people.  If you’re one of them, join up and take the time to get your privacy settings the way you want them.  Or you could just accept their recommended settings.  (Don’t forget to walk into your boss’s office in your underwear in order to be consistently open should you choose that level of sharing.)

Okay.  Normal readers have now signed up for Facebook and set up their privacy settings.

Tinkerers, control-freaks, and fanatics – follow me.  Continue reading

Posted in Geeky | Tagged | Comments Off on You Sayin'